|
Kuban argues that the decayed
remains were really a Basking Shark. (1) The Protein analysis was
similar to that of a shark, but scientists say that such a result is meaningless
since such similarities abound. (2) Those familiar with basking sharks
deny that the 'sea monster' was a basking shark.
This extract of a message board is by the fair use rule, and seeks to
demonstrate a point. People familar with Basking Sharks deny that
the Japanese dredged up a Basking Shark. The cited message is typical.
| View Thread | Post Response | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
---|
I saw a documentary on sea serpents and lake monsters and they showed the picture of this "basking shark". That carcass looked more like an unknown creature with a long neck and a large body with four distinguishible flippers attached to it. Although I am not an expert on this subject, I'm convinced that is was a dead specimen of some type of sea creature we have not discovered yet.
| View Thread | Post Response | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
---|